ads

FTP Uploader for Bulk Video Delivery

Nobody launches a catalogue through a browser. FTP gives distributors a route they already know and gives you ingest that does not need babysitting.

FTP Uploader for Bulk Video Delivery

Why the First Two Hundred Titles Are Different

The Vodlix FTP uploader is built for the reality that nobody launches a catalogue through a browser. A web form is fine for one film and painful by the twentieth. A launch library is hundreds of files arriving from a distributor with their own delivery process and their own tools. FTP gives distributors a route they already know and gives your team ingest that does not need babysitting. For OTT operators onboarding a back catalogue, FTP is the practical route in.


bulk.svg
Bulk ingest

Hundreds of files at once.

resume.svg
Resumable

No failed uploads at ninety percent.

standard.svg
Familiar

The route distributors already use.

Why FTP Is Still the Right Answer for Bulk Delivery

FTP remains the right answer for bulk video delivery because browser uploads fail in predictable ways: they break on the largest file, they need someone present to keep the tab open, and they do not resume after a dropped connection. FTP was built for exactly this job, with large files, unattended transfers and resumable uploads. Everyone who delivers content professionally understands it. Vodlix supports secure FTP so the industry's standard delivery method works with your platform.


A Drop Point, Not a Progress Bar

The Vodlix FTP uploader is a drop point rather than a progress bar. Distributors and production partners place files into a route they know, and ingest proceeds without anyone watching a browser. A migration of hundreds of titles runs on its own, overnight if needed, while your team does other work. Unattended ingest is what makes large scale content delivery practical for a small operations team.


FTP Uploads Feed Straight Into Transcoding

Files delivered through the Vodlix FTP uploader feed the same transcoding pipeline as every other upload, so they arrive encoded, packaged and ready to publish. There is no separate processing step for FTP content. Once transcoding completes, titles appear in the CMS with their processing state visible, covered under Video Uploading and Transcoding. Bulk delivery and standard ingest produce identical results, which keeps the catalogue consistent however content arrives.


Frequently Asked Questions

Have questions about taking advantage of this limited-time offer? Check out the FAQ for answers.

Why use FTP instead of browser upload on Vodlix?
Browser uploads fail on large batches, need someone present and do not resume after a dropped connection. The Vodlix FTP uploader handles hundreds of large files unattended and resumes interrupted transfers.
Who is the Vodlix FTP uploader for?
The Vodlix FTP uploader is for distributors, post production teams and content operators delivering large launch libraries or back catalogues, using a delivery method they already know.
Does FTP resume interrupted transfers?
Yes. Unlike browser uploads, transfers to the Vodlix FTP drop point resume after a connection drop rather than failing near the end, so large files arrive reliably.
What happens after files land on the Vodlix FTP server?
Files delivered by FTP enter the same Vodlix transcoding pipeline as every other upload, so they are encoded, packaged and ready to publish with their processing state visible in the CMS.
Is FTP difficult for content distributors to use?
No. FTP is a universally understood delivery route in the media industry, so distributors can deliver to your Vodlix platform with the tools and processes they already use.
How should partners name their files?
Consistently, and it is worth agreeing the convention before the first delivery rather than after. A consistently named batch can be matched to metadata almost automatically. An inconsistent one becomes manual work that no feature can remove.
Can different partners have their own access?
An ingest folder is a door into your platform and should be treated like one, with separate credentials per partner. That way access can be revoked for one relationship without disturbing any of the others.
What formats can be delivered?
The same range the platform accepts elsewhere, since everything joins one pipeline after ingest. In practice the constraint is what a distributor can produce rather than what the platform will take.